I will admit I grew up wanting the exact iconic colour scheme of gold rims on Subaru Blue. Yes, the STI has a bonnet scoop. 2) I can fit a rear-facing car seat and a stroller in my car (yes, in the ‘small’ trunk without removing the sound system). Yes that means the STI is the last one standing, but is it the best one left? You don’t want the no-name plush seats with somewhat functionality, you want the racing seats. No special authenticated plaque. "Looks like we've got ourselves a dogfight! On the other hand, is the smoother, low grumble of the Evo. When it comes to to the 2011 stock models, the Evo is the clear winner. But it's not that simple either, as another important ratio to examine is weight to power. Gearing is slightly taller and more realistic than that of the STI, leading to less frequent shifting and certainty of which gear to choose when entering a turn. For that money you are in the realm of Used BMW M3's and the new Camaro SS (this isn't the same camaro with only straight line power). The STi and EVO are not in the same class, they are AWD and the STi is close to $40,000 with the options that my MS3 has on it. Or just left? They’ve branded themselves with their overall looks; they are not hiding behind specific colours. The Evo system is more agile but the STI system feels more secure and it is the one I'd prefer driving in Canada winters. Subaru has done a great job branding using that paint arrangement. In my opinion, there is no car that will love you more than an Evo will. Discussion Starter • #1 • Oct 6, 2016. Mitsubishi VS Subaru - EVO VS STI - Who completes the 1000m first? It’s said that the STI is a more practical, friendlier daily driver. Go ahead, I dare you. The power improvement comes from a revision of the turbo's compressor housing and a more aggressive muffler, and the power delivery is kept somewhat more linear through variable intake valve timing/phasing. The Evo IX flexes a MIVEC-equipped (Mitsubishi Innovative Valve timing and Electronic Control) turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-4 now boasting 286 bhp and 289 lb.-ft. of torque. However, don’t just throw the Evo out because they don’t have an explicit colour scheme. Road & Track Performance Car of the Year 2021, PCOTY 2021: How the Track Club Founders Voted, Why the C8 Corvette's Suspension Is So Impressive, The Ferrari 308 GTS Was the Ride of '80s Hollywood, This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. The suspension not only has a longer range of travel, but is better suited for soaking up road irregularities (not to mention landings) than the MR's setup. Owners of both brands should be, even considering brand loyalty, praising each other’s work. He probably had to replace the entire chassis and suspension to make it a frontrunner. Neither of these vehicles is particularly luxurious or comfortable. The Evo's dynamic characteristics not only make it predictable, but extremely confidence-inspiring, with Bilstein shocks that feel best suited for relatively well-paved roads. Don’t lift off the throttle, because you’ll spin. Hey everyone, I really didn't know where to put this so i just put it here. the evo has the better suspension type for the rear, so its less effected by body roll, and its engine is a closed deck type, so its block should take more power. Aussies are well familiar with the concept having to choose between red and blue. Here is the second side to the story, and obviously the truth... Not so long ago, CT staff writer Darren Cassey wrote something that I, and many of you disagreed with. The Evo's 6-speed manual transmission (MR only) is crisp and precise, making missed shifts rare. The turbocharged boxer engine in the WRX makes 268 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. You suddenly feel like an advocate of rude awakenings, with a mission to complete every time you strap into the driver's seat. This hour, TED speakers explore how repairing the wrongs of … It really depends on what you as a driver want from your car. As a road warrior, its sharpness, directness, and aggressive yet forgiving nature leave the STI no choice but to step aside. The Evo is STI-owner approved. Today, the rally-inspired fight of the early-2000s: Evo vs. STI. For our money, it’s the STI and if you don’t like the hatchback look, there is a new sedan coming in 2011. It is well known that the chassis is more responsive in the Evo, and the S-AWC creates the best possible traction in all scenarios. Not only are they well-matched opponents, but each could also be arguably superior to the other in some way, shape or function. We all heard the news that Mitsubishi has discontinued the Evo X. The competitiveness, though, is what has driven the manufacturers to build the best cars possible, and what has pushed them to the top for all of these years. Well, this is the difficult question. Then it truly is a special edition. Even stock these cars give you the satisfaction that you’re driving a brilliantly quick car. What makes a true apology? I had to look up what its name even was when I wrote this. It keeps up and even eclipses the extremely well engineered STi’s vehicle control capabilities. Evo MR updates include a tweaked front fascia integrating foglights with minor changes to head- and taillights, a revised hollow-design carbon-fiber rear wing, body-colored vortex generators, lighter Enkei wheels, and aluminum pedals to match the MR's aluminum roof construction. There are new slant ed bulbous headlights and cleaner taillight clusters too. A roof spoiler said to enhance stability graces the top of the rear window, and the underside of the car receives a new diffuser mounted aft of the rear wheels. Our product picks are editor-tested, expert-approved. As of this year's Super Lap Battle finals and Import Tuner's own STI vs. EVO Shootout at Buttonwillow Raceway in California, and Japan-based Rev Speed magazine's Super Battle at … Both are high on plastic and low on soft touch materials. Evo feels faster than the STI. But let’s face it, why are you buying this type of car if you aren’t going to drive hard? In a world exclusive, we hijacked the Evolution IX launch to do battle with Subaru’s STi. Look at the picture. Firstly, it just depends on what you’re planning to do with it. This article was written by freelance writer Kate Sickelka. The noise is better. 5 talking about this. That may be so, but I have two points here that may make you look twice at the Evo instead. Road & Track participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. Mitsubishi vs Subaru, the improved 2005 Lancer Evolution IX meets the Impreza WRX STi to see which rally legend is the best - WhichCar is the online home of MOTOR magazine. from a technical stand point, i feel that the sti has the better drivetrain layout, better weight distribution, and stronger transmission. ", From the December 2005 issue of Road & Track, "Air to mission control, bogie has been spotted, weapons are hot, awaiting confirmation to engage!". This probably depends upon the country, but certainly in the US it feels as though many STI owners around do not understand that the competition between the STI and the Evo is what makes the cars succeed; they tend to be snobby and stick to their own car club. The Evo's 6-speed manual transmission (MR only) is crisp and precise, making missed shifts rare. The Evo vs. STI battle was a fun one, but does anybody remember the 237 HP Lancer Ralliart? They both are always splitting power. What does it mean to make amends for past mistakes? No limited edition. Wants all Evo and STi lovers under one page. The experience of piloting one of these tarmac-tearing, dirt-loving predators down a favorable road can often lead one's imagination astray. And it’s more streamlined. A victor in this rivalry is not easily determined. Even if the sti has more hp the evo … The article was called 9 Reasons Why The Subaru Impreza WRX STI Is Better Than The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, and as an Evo owner myself, I had to give my side of the story. Please confirm you agree to the use of tracking cookies as outlined in the Cookies Policy. The race to one-up each other comes in the form of add-ons instead of overhauls, mainly because Subaru and Mitsubishi know what outstanding performers they already have. We may earn a commission through links on our site. If you’re looking for a car that always sounds like it’s trying to clear its throat, … You can’t tell me the STI is more understated. The leather-wrapped steering wheel has a better feel, and the gauges are visually more appealing. The Evo and the STI are better, in my opinion. Turn-in is still quicker than the STI's with a new simple and ergonomic titanium-finished steering wheel to handle. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR (2014) vs Subaru WRX STI (2015) As of now, the Sti is the more reliable car of the two for people who drive em like they're meant to be driven. SAYC, the Evo’s rear torque transferring system/yaw control, is what ultimately makes it victorious in this category. Anyway, I love subarus and my next car when I am out of college hopefully will be a sti, but I was at the track a couple weeks ago and evo's were beating sti's all day long. The interior of the Subaru is comfortable and well equipped, making it less industrial-like and more inviting. Throwing these two contenders into a ring together is like throwing the Incredible Hulk in with Juggernaut, and then telling them to have at it for a couple of rounds. Such a title is probably having you wondering if you clicked on the right review but the facts are here, you cannot honestly consider those 2 vehicules as "sportscars" anymore but rather some "Sports Family Sedans". Vintage Stig: Mitsubishi Evo 8 vs. Subaru WRX STI We're curing our Top Gear cravings with frequent spins through the YouTube archives. the japanese version of the sti vs evo, the evo uses a bunch of electronics to control its handling, while the … http://bit.ly/2mDCQD3 Built Subaru STi vs Built Evo X! STi vs. Evo AWD Systems? Power from the Subaru's larger 2.5-liter turbocharged flat-4 comes in early and seems to stay fairly linear where the Evo's power kicks in abruptly. 9 Reasons Why The Subaru Impreza WRX STI Is Better Than The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo. The Evo has a bonnet scoop, too (in fact, it has two more practical vents on the hood than the STI). And when the paddle-shifting and extra-beefy suspension of the Evo is considered, the margin of victory starts to look pretty vast for the Evo. The STI's overall nature, though still great for track and autocross events, seems to favor a dirtier environment. The front lip not only is a functional aid in aerodynamics, it gives the stock Evo the lowered aggressive look. The 2015 STI has a bit of improved steering and suspension over previous generations, but any reviews and first-hand experiences say the Evo still feels sharper and grounded while still being light. Here are my arguments for why it’s the Evo that’s in fact the better car: Sure, Subaru has been able to make a name for itself through Colin McRae, but he drove a heavily modified STI with all the best equipment and factory sponsorship. The body kit on the Evo X SSS package has it all – it’s sporty, sexy, and sleek. If you need to haul something bigger than what can fit in the car, buy a truck. Advertisement. I’ve done multiple 2500-mile road trips in those seats; I know they’re comfortable. The Evo is hard on the road, the five-speed box is outdated, and the interior, in typical Evo fashion, is pretty poor. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and the Subaru WRX STI have been competitors, red in tooth and claw, for more than a dozen years in the U.S., … If you care about a special colour scheme, have it custom done. While neither is particularly comfortable, the 2008-2014 Subaru WRX STI offers one thing the Evo doesn’t: a hatchback b… The STI, on the other hand, does not dis appoint in that area. - … 176 Posts . Yes, Subaru has done well by offering Limited Edition and special occasion STIs.