It is designed to be simple and efficient. Tiling means there are no fancy compositing or window effects to take up system resources. Working with i3 is similar to working with the terminal, however, it was designed to be faster and more efficient in many ways. i3: C: Text: Dynamic: i3bar: Yes (Layout is preserved) text piped to i3bar (i3status/conky and others can be used) External: tree, v-split, h-split, stacked, tabbed, max, can be nested infinitely: None, 1-pix or 2-pix, optional titlebars, can hide edge borders: commands via ipc (or i3-msg, which uses ipc) XCB: n regions: Yes: Active LeftWM: Rust It is neither bloated nor fancy. Has a steep learning curve for beginners. The most important reason people chose i3 is: One of the biggest attractions of i3 is that it can be configured just about any way the user likes. You can use a workaround - a shell script to config parts on demand. Restarts pick up new versions of i3 or the updated config file, so you can upgrade to a newer version or quickly see the changes to i3 without quitting your X session. I believe the second best that I used over i3 would be bspwm even though you have a separated keyboard config file. swallow or fakefullscreen, that is not seen in many other WMs. Xinerama simply was not designed for dynamic configuration. … I also like having a simple shell script to update the status bar. Configuration is achieved via plain text file and extending i3 is possible using its Unix domain socket and JSON based IPC interface from many programming languages.. Like wmii, i3 uses a control system very similar to that of vi. One question though before I switch. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All that being said, I decided to stick with dwm because it's super slim and stable, and I realized I just don't need all the features that i3 has. And if your in it for that go for it. i3 is configured through a plaintext configuration file. And there's no good way to get the keyboard centered in your work area. Some window managers tile, some stack, and some float. In the question“What are the best window managers for Linux?” i3 is ranked 1st while dwm is ranked 2nd. Has a plain-text config file that it … i3 can allow for the user to manage floating windows. 0. answered 2012-07-08 20:21:11 +0000 Read about them and follow the examples, start by right clicking a specific tag. Using transparent windows can cause them to crash. dwm tags vs. i3 workspaces: in dwm, windows are assigned to 1 or more tags; in i3, windows occupy just a single workspace (by default). This makes it rather easy to recommend i3 to other people without worrying whether or not they have the knowledge to configure it as it can be read by anyone without prior knowledge. make check runs the i3 testsuite. dwm is blazing fast. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. So, in dwm, there's a default binding that lets you quickly view a window that is 'in' another tag by temporarily assigning it to the currently viewed tag, rather than jumping to another tag and then back (it's a bit like pulling the window into view, then pushing it back). i3 is a tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii and written in C. It supports tiling, stacking, and tabbing layouts, which it handles dynamically. There's even a keybinding for temporarily assigning all windows to the current tag, i.e. https://dwm.suckless.org ----- RICE def. Just to know my tiling window mangers better. What are the best Linux tiling window managers with high DPI support for retina displays. I like it more than dwm as it supports scratchpad much better than dwm patch. It enables the user to never have to take their hands off the keyboard, meaning that they can use their computer quickly and efficiently. Thankfully it takes about 5 seconds to compile being so few lines of code. i3 is the best, I would say. Consider installing one of the following packages from the AUR: 1. dmenu2AUR: dmenu fork with many useful patches applied and additional capabilities added including dimming, specifying a custom opacity, and underlining. Also, I really like using a manual tiling wm, rather than a dynamic one. As a developer, I value these features, as I can use the extra capacity to power my favorite development tools or test stuff locally using containers or virtual machines. There are, of course, dwm patches for more complicated layouts, though. i3's superb window management. Tags system. In i3, I used to have an audio mode for adjusting my volume, a gaps mode for gaps, a "passthrough" mode for disabling i3 bindings, etc. When comparing dwm vs bspwm, the Slant community recommends dwm for most people. You can configure i3 so that your keys for moving windows is similar to vim, for example, M-j to move the window down. Window managers have this same split. This is a prerequisite for the AX_EXTEND_SRCDIR macro and building in a separate directory is common practice anyway. I'm an i3 wm user for about 2 months, I think. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for … While pretty good and easy to use for common tasks, the configuration language is missing the include directive common in other languages. I much prefer herbstluftwm and it's scripting interface. I try out monsterwm and really didn't like it. I used it happily for a few years. Basic knowledge of C language, general programming, and compilation are all required. Obviously, your preferences may be different if that's not the case for you. ratpoison. I tried FrankenWM and fall in love with it. The layout isn't automatic. Maybe once a year? Sometimes this is necessary, even when the Dev rejects feature requests. The default is easy to change if you only want the stacking mode, then it becomes the lightest full-featured stacking WM around. Sway allows you to arrange your application windows logically, rather than spatially. I tried DWM … Before I gave up on tilers altogether, I thought it was a sweet deal (being a fan of wmii). awesome is a free and open-source next-generation tiling manager for X built to be fast … Hi there, just installed i3 on my laptop to try it out. As for ricing complexity, Fedora has a extra package (dwm-user) that makes it dead simple to configure dwm. It's clean codes and it's not really hard to learn. The developer refuses to allow this feature. I liked i3 quite a lot and used it for a time. i3 is a tiling window manager, completely written from scratch.The target platforms are GNU/Linux and BSD operating systems, our code is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) under the BSD license. i3 is primarily targeted at advanced users and developers. frankenwm. The killer feature for dwm, as with Awesome and xmonad, is the part where the tool automatically arranges the windows for you, filling the entire space of your screen. awesome. In this video, we show how to create a "mouse mode", so that we can close, minimize using buttons. Most of these dynamic window managers (xmonad, awesome, dwm, i3) can even handle floating Windows. Even though it's the first one I had to recompile for every change I make. The Core m3 is good for low-energy tablets and laptops. Any commentary will be appreciated. They offer unique functionality, e.g. I try out bspwm, herbstluftwm, and monsterwm. wingo Just that will dramatically reduce the amount of times you will need a rebuild. Configuration is simple since it is done in plain text. In response to questions about my preferred window manager and ricing, here's what I currently use: dwm. User can assign specific workspaces to specific displays as well as apps to workspaces. Keyboard shortcut based navigation can seem daunting at first, but one quickly gets used to it. Floating mode can be toggled by pressing $mod+Shift+Space. This makes it pain to play games on laptops using discrete GPU. i3 permits tabbing through windows by turning on Tab mode with $mod+w.This shortcut can be changed in config file. And i3 has been great. Thanks to the small codebase, many users contributed patches to the suckless website. For questions that are not answered by the i3 user guide, because they concern tools outside of i3 for example, there is the community question & answer site. See docs/testsuite for details. BSPWM vs dwm , i3 , awesome. verb /rīs/ to make a desktop environment or window manager visually attractive ; Can you teach me how to rice i3? Contrary to most other window managers, when you view a tag you are not ‘visiting’ a workspace: you are pulling the tagged windows into a single workspace. One thing I sort of wish that dwm had, which i3 has, is modes. Screen area is not wasted by window decorations. Limiting myself to the core features of dwm has actually improved my workflow (I think). Do you want automatic or manual tiling? And in third place of Tiling Window Managers I used. You can do it on a desktop, but the whole workspace feels lopsided when you do. To this end, dwm is kept under 2000 SLOC, and is an exemplar of clean, readable code (C). You edit the source and compile a binary (besides for window titles and such, all input data is known at compile time). While it's very powerful and easy to learn, it may not be entirely user-friendly for those who have never edited a text configuration. I3. I went back and forth between dwm and i3 before finally settling onto dwm. When comparing dwm vs i3, the Slant community recommends i3 for most people. The user must move panels manually and may indeed end up spending time on that rather than on working with the application. Remember that Openbox is also highly configurable and you can make it work pretty much as a tiler as well. Splitting a window in half to make room is really convenient and lets me avoid windows getting a strange aspect ratio if too many are on the screen. I just find that I don't seem to need all the cool tiling options it has. That is a common issue with laptops which renders some programs in discrete GPU but passes the frames through integrated GPU to display. Sorry for that. The dwm status bar can be set to display all kinds of useful information, such as volume level, wifi signal strength, and battery notification. I3 isn’t a desktop environment per se but rather a text-based window manager. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I've used both for over a year, and I really prefer i3. This, while giving users all the flexibility they could ask for, also makes dwm as lightweight as possible, and means that users have a full understanding of how it works.
2020 i3 vs dwm